NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE
he indispensable Ed Whelan wrote not one, not two, not three, but four Bench Memos last week about Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s views on stare decisis, the legal principle compelling judges to adhere to precedent. Whelan’s posts were mostly written as rejoinders to hysterical critics of Barrett who accused her of being “right of Antonin Scalia,” and a “vote for [Clarence] Thomas-style radicalism.” They shouldn’t threaten us all with such a good time.
Whelan convincingly reveals these accusations to be rooted in partisanship, not a fair reading of her record. Indeed, Barrett has written nothing to suggest that she believes in …