With Threat Of U.S. Boycotting Olympics, China's State Media Says ‘Why Should China Care…?’

Typical of its response to allegations that the United States and four other English-speaking allies may not send official delegations to the 2022 Winter Olympics because of human rights concerns, China reiterated its opposition to the “politicization of sports” in a statement.

However, China’s state media seem to be adopting a different tack, basically arguing that a diplomatic boycott would be no great issue and that the country would be better off if bothersome nations did not send officials to the country in question.


Several media outlets claimed that British Prime Minister Boris Johnson was contemplating a diplomatic boycott of the next Winter Olympics in Beijing, after President Biden’s announcement to reporters last Thursday that a diplomatic boycott was “something we are exploring.”

Then, on Sunday, the Times of London reported Britain was speaking with its friends in the so-called “Five Eyes” intelligence-sharing alliance — the United States, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand – about the possibility of a diplomatic boycott of the United Nations.

In response to the news, Zhao Lijian, a spokeswoman for the Chinese foreign ministry, said, “China strongly opposes the politicization of sports, as well as any conduct or comments that are contrary to the spirit of the Olympic Charter.” An excessive amount of hype would simply serve to harm the interests of athletes from other nations.”

Chinese Communist Party Global Times expressed disdain for the West, saying it should let Western countries to go their own way rather than enabling them to serve as “the moral police” in the region.

According to an editorial, “China should not be concerned by their sounds since it has chosen its own route.”

According to the report, “China used to be concerned about preserving a cordial environment with the West and about how it was seen by the rest of the world, especially by the West.”

Something has to be done about this. Because of China’s ascent to become a significant power and the United States’ waning global hegemony, Western dominance has been challenged.”

As previously stated in a different piece, Global Times speculated that the Olympics are about the athletes, not the politicians who come to watch.

“Can’t we still refer to the event as an Olympic Games even if leaders from a few nations don’t turn up?” you may wonder. Was the Games ever intended to serve as a display for government officials or officials from other countries? “Of course not,” she says.

As a result, any politician who regards his or her future participation in the Winter Olympic Games as a favor to Beijing or as a negotiating tool to add pressure on China while pursuing greater interests would only come off as speculative and selfish.”

The CCP newspaper also said that it was past time for China to cease inviting dignitaries from the United States to attend the games.

“Such authorities should not be allowed to attend the Olympics.” They are harboring nefarious plans. Even if they do show up, they will just cause further problems. The Olympics will remain untainted if they do not participate. “China does not have the luxury of time to accommodate them.”

Silencing or trying to silence individuals who attempt to speak out is a crime against humanity.

Campaigners for human rights and Western parliamentarians have called for a boycott of China for months, citing the Chinese Communist Party’s widespread human rights breaches in Xinjiang, atrocities in Tibet, and suffocation of democracy in Hong Kong.

During the last several days, the mystery surrounding Chinese tennis player and Olympian Peng Shuai has inflamed the topic even more.

For about three weeks, Peng remained absent from the public eye after making an accusation of sexual assault against a top Communist Party official on social media, which was swiftly taken down by the CCP.

In response to concerns made by international tennis players, the Women’s Tennis Association, government and United Nations officials, and others over Peng’s absence, International Olympic Committee president Thomas Bach arranged a video conversation with her on Sunday.

The International Olympic Committee stated in a short statement thereafter that she had verified she was “safe and healthy,” but that she had requested that her privacy be respected.

Bach’s participation, on the other hand, may have had a negative impact, since the group was later accused of assisting Beijing’s propaganda efforts.

“The International Olympic Committee has gone from being deafeningly silent about Beijing’s appalling human rights record to actively collaborating with Chinese authorities in undermining freedom of expression and disregarding allegations of sexual assault,” said Yaqiu Wang, a researcher for Human Rights Watch who specializes in China.

Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), the ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the IOC’s promotion of this latest stunt “turns the IOC from willfully ignorant to an active participant in the CCP’s mistreatment of Peng.” “It has been disturbing to see the IOC take statements from CCP propagandists at face value since Peng Shuai’s disappearance, but their promotion of this latest stunt turns the IOC from willfully ignorant to an active participant

“It is apparent that the International Olympic Committee is more concerned with maintaining its financial ties with the Chinese Communist Party than with preserving the welfare of Olympic competitors.”

According to State Department spokesperson Ned Price, the administration is concerned about the situation in Peng Shuai and is “closely watching” it.

“We will continue to stand up for freedom of expression in the PRC context, and in all contexts, especially in light of what we’ve seen from the PRC, which is essentially a zero-tolerance approach to criticism and a track record of silencing or attempting to silence those who do attempt to speak out,” he said.


When asked whether it was time to launch a diplomatic boycott of the 2022 games, Price said that he had no new information to provide at this time.

“Our opinion on Xinjiang, and our position on the People’s Republic of China’s persistent human rights violations, is quite clear,” he said. I’d want to reiterate that we have taken a number of efforts to promote responsibility for the continuing human rights atrocities, including genocide in Xinjiang, and that we intend to continue doing so. ” But I’m afraid I don’t have any new information on the Olympics.”

There was also no update on when a decision may be released from White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, who said that “clearly, human rights and the treatment of human rights in China is something that we follow carefully, and the world observes closely.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *